There have to be many men who are grateful to Kiera for the fact that she is willing to go topless in films. And I would almost, almost, think well of her that she is liberated enough to feel willing to be naked. I think people can get too caught up in the naked body. But she rather blows this as she continues with the interview. It is all very well to say how liberating it is but when you then follow up by saying that she will show off her top half but has a body double for her bottom (how do you explain that at a party when asked what you do "I am a bottom double"). This just means that she isn't so much liberated as vain and has certain parts she likes to flaunt.
And, considering how comfortable she is with her top half, you might want to spend a minute or two playing "Spot The Difference" between these two shots from King Arthur, one for the UK and one for the USA.
2 comments:
Trying to work out the point there..ie has she no chest and has had oone added in one pic...or...does she have a chest which is considered too large and shocking for certain audiences adn so the art dept has removed it..hmmmm..either way there really isn't much there......and which shot is for which marekt?? let me guess, uk with small bump, US, flat..am I right???
Other way. The picture on the left is the "real" shot and is OK for the UK but the picture on the right was digitally enhanced for the US market.
Post a Comment